Crossbench MPs Criticize Taylor's Speech on Helen Haines Attack
Angus Taylor’s remarks drew sharp rebuke from Monique Ryan and Zali Steggall, who argued the opposition leader failed to acknowledge the impact of political rhetoric.
By Aminata Patterson ·

Opposition leader Angus Taylor is facing direct criticism from two independent members of parliament regarding his recent speech on the safety of Australian politicians. The dispute erupted in Canberra this week as Parliament resumed its session, forcing a confrontation between the major party and the crossbench over the appropriate response to violence in political life.
The tension follows the alleged attack on Indi MP Helen Haines, which occurred one week ago outside her electorate office in northern Victoria. Haines sustained severe injuries, including the loss of both legs. A 43-year-old man has been charged in connection with the incident, and police are continuing their investigation without disclosing a confirmed motive.
In his address, Taylor rejected the notion that intense parliamentary debate causes political violence. He stated that the Westminster system is designed to resolve differences through rigorous discussion rather than force. Taylor argued that those who resort to intimidation or violence cross a line that must never be crossed. He also urged judges to impose harsher penalties on those found guilty of such acts and suggested that Australia should be celebrated more openly to reduce feelings of national guilt.
Monique Ryan, the independent member for Kooyong, described Taylor’s response as hugely disappointing. She told ABC TV that if the opposition leader did not believe words matter, she could not understand how he aspired to lead a political party. Ryan asserted that if parliament could not rise to the occasion after such an unthinkable event, it never would.
Zali Steggall, the independent member for Warringah who sits beside Haines in the lower house, expressed personal disappointment with the speech. She stated that there is a clear link between words and actions, and that Taylor had not grasped the lesson Haines would want the public to learn. Steggall added that this standard of care should apply to media reporting, election advertising, and social media platforms.
Former Liberal leader Peter Dutton told News24 that further violence against politicians was inevitable. He said the incident came as no surprise and that such tensions had been building for a long period. One Nation MP Barnaby Joyce also opposed changing parliamentary practice, calling the attack un-Australian. Joyce argued that while parliament has a role, it would not solve the problem, pointing instead to vindictive rhetoric in public life.
Steggall spoke with Haines’s husband, Phil Haines, in Canberra on Monday. Phil Haines asked fellow MPs to raise the bar so that a meaningful shift toward respectful debate would have occurred by the time Helen Haines returns to parliament. He emphasized that while disagreement is acceptable, words have a tangible impact.
Source: The Guardian
More Politics · World news · Report a business · Got a Story?





